269 lines
9.0 KiB
Markdown
269 lines
9.0 KiB
Markdown
|
# Deploy Lock
|
||
|
|
||
|
This is a tool to lock a cluster or service, in order to prevent people from deploying changes during test automation or
|
||
|
an infrastructure incident.
|
||
|
|
||
|
## Contents
|
||
|
|
||
|
- [Deploy Lock](#deploy-lock)
|
||
|
- [Contents](#contents)
|
||
|
- [Abstract](#abstract)
|
||
|
- [Deploy Path](#deploy-path)
|
||
|
- [Lock Data](#lock-data)
|
||
|
- [Messaging](#messaging)
|
||
|
- [Example Usage](#example-usage)
|
||
|
- [Prevent a deploy during an automation run](#prevent-a-deploy-during-an-automation-run)
|
||
|
- [Prevent a deploy during a production incident](#prevent-a-deploy-during-a-production-incident)
|
||
|
- [Prevent duplicate deploys of the same service from conflicting](#prevent-duplicate-deploys-of-the-same-service-from-conflicting)
|
||
|
- [Command-line Interface](#command-line-interface)
|
||
|
- [User Options](#user-options)
|
||
|
- [Backend Options](#backend-options)
|
||
|
- [REST API](#rest-api)
|
||
|
- [Endpoints](#endpoints)
|
||
|
|
||
|
## Abstract
|
||
|
|
||
|
### Deploy Path
|
||
|
|
||
|
The path to a service, starting with the cluster and environment: `apps/staging/a/auth-app`.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Components:
|
||
|
|
||
|
- cluster
|
||
|
- env (`account`)
|
||
|
- target
|
||
|
- service (namespace)
|
||
|
- branch (`ref`)
|
||
|
|
||
|
When _locking_ a path, only the full path is locked, not parents.
|
||
|
|
||
|
When _checking_ a path, each segment is checked recursively, so a lock at `apps/staging` will prevent all services
|
||
|
from being deployed into both the A and B clusters.
|
||
|
|
||
|
- cluster comes first because that is how we structure the git repositories (repo = cluster, branch = env)
|
||
|
- to lock multiple clusters in the same environment, run the command repeatedly with the same lock data
|
||
|
- to lock a specific branch, put it in the path: `apps/staging/a/auth-app/main`
|
||
|
|
||
|
TODO: should the service name (component 3) map to the kubernetes namespace rather than the service?
|
||
|
|
||
|
### Lock Data
|
||
|
|
||
|
Each lock must contain the following fields:
|
||
|
|
||
|
```typescript
|
||
|
interface Lock {
|
||
|
type: 'automation' | 'deploy' | 'incident';
|
||
|
author: string;
|
||
|
links: Map<string, string>;
|
||
|
|
||
|
// Timestamps, calculated from --duration and --until
|
||
|
created_at: number;
|
||
|
updated_at: number;
|
||
|
expires_at: number;
|
||
|
|
||
|
// Env fields
|
||
|
// often duplicates of path, but useful for cross-project locks
|
||
|
env: {
|
||
|
cluster: string;
|
||
|
account: string;
|
||
|
target?: string; // optional
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
|
||
|
// CI fields, optional
|
||
|
ci?: {
|
||
|
project: string;
|
||
|
ref: string;
|
||
|
commit: string;
|
||
|
pipeline: string;
|
||
|
job: string;
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
```
|
||
|
|
||
|
Friendly strings for `type`: `An automation run`, `A deploy`, `An incident`.
|
||
|
|
||
|
If `$CI` is not set, the `ci` sub-struct will not be present.
|
||
|
|
||
|
TODO: should there be a `type` for `A release freeze` (`freeze`)?
|
||
|
|
||
|
### Messaging
|
||
|
|
||
|
- create a new lock: 'locked ${path} for ${type:friendly} until ${expires_at:datetime}'
|
||
|
- > Locked `apps/acceptance/a` for a deploy until Sat 31 Dec, 12:00
|
||
|
- > Locked `gitlab/production` for an incident until Sat 31 Dec, 12:00
|
||
|
- error, existing lock: 'error: ${path} is locked until ${expires_at:datetime} by ${type:friendly} in ${cluster}/${env}'
|
||
|
- > Error: `apps/acceptance` is locked until Sat 31 Dec, 12:00 by an automation run in `testing/staging`.
|
||
|
|
||
|
### Example Usage
|
||
|
|
||
|
#### Prevent a deploy during an automation run
|
||
|
|
||
|
This would be used to prevent an application deploy during a test automation run, to make sure the application does not
|
||
|
restart or change versions and invalidate the test results.
|
||
|
|
||
|
1. QA starts an automation run
|
||
|
1. Automation calls `deploy-lock lock apps/acceptance --type automation --duration 90m`
|
||
|
2. Someone merges code into `develop` of `saas-app`
|
||
|
1. The `saas-app` pipeline runs a deploy job
|
||
|
2. The deploy job calls `deploy-lock check apps/acceptance/a/saas-app/develop`, which recursively checks:
|
||
|
1. `apps`
|
||
|
2. `apps/acceptance`
|
||
|
1. locked by automation, exit with an error
|
||
|
3. `apps/acceptance/a`
|
||
|
4. `apps/acceptance/a/saas-app`
|
||
|
5. `apps/acceptance/a/saas-app/develop`
|
||
|
3. Deploy job exits with an error, _does not_ deploy
|
||
|
3. Automation pipeline ends
|
||
|
1. Final job calls `deploy-lock unlock apps/acceptance --type automation`
|
||
|
1. Specifying the `--type` during `unlock` prevents automation/deploy jobs from accidentally removing an incident
|
||
|
2. If the final automation job does not run, the lock will still expire after 90 minutes (`--duration`)
|
||
|
4. Retry `saas-app` deploy job
|
||
|
1. No lock, runs normally
|
||
|
|
||
|
#### Prevent a deploy during a production incident
|
||
|
|
||
|
This would be used to prevent an application deploy during an infrastructure outage, to make sure existing pods
|
||
|
continue running.
|
||
|
|
||
|
1. DevOps receives an alert and declares an incident for the `apps/production/a` cluster
|
||
|
2. The first responder runs `deploy-lock lock apps/production --type incident --duration 6h`
|
||
|
1. This locks _both_ production clusters while we shift traffic to the working one
|
||
|
3. Someone merges code into `main` of `auth-app`
|
||
|
1. The `auth-app` pipeline runs a deploy job
|
||
|
2. The deploy job calls `deploy-lock check apps/production/a/auth-app`, which recursively checks:
|
||
|
1. `apps`
|
||
|
2. `apps/production`
|
||
|
1. locked by incident, exit with an error
|
||
|
3. `apps/production/a`
|
||
|
4. `apps/production/a/auth-app`
|
||
|
3. Deploy job exits with an error, _does not_ deploy
|
||
|
4. Incident is resolved
|
||
|
1. First responder runs `deploy-lock unlock apps/production --type incident`
|
||
|
5. Retry `auth-app` deploy job
|
||
|
1. No lock, runs normally
|
||
|
|
||
|
#### Prevent duplicate deploys of the same service from conflicting
|
||
|
|
||
|
This would be used to prevent multiple simultaneous deploys of the same project from conflicting with one another, in
|
||
|
a service without ephemeral environments/branch switching.
|
||
|
|
||
|
1. Someone starts a pipeline on `feature/foo` of `chat-app`
|
||
|
1. The `chat-app` pipeline runs a deploy job
|
||
|
2. The deploy job calls `deploy-lock lock apps/staging/a/chat-app`
|
||
|
2. Someone else starts a pipeline on `feature/bar` of `chat-app`
|
||
|
1. The `chat-app` pipeline runs another deploy job
|
||
|
1. The first one has not finished and is still mid-rollout
|
||
|
2. The second deploy job calls `deploy-lock lock apps/staging/a/chat-app`, which recursively checks:
|
||
|
1. `apps`
|
||
|
2. `apps/staging`
|
||
|
3. `apps/staging/a`
|
||
|
4. `apps/staging/a/chat-app`
|
||
|
1. locked by deploy, exit with an error
|
||
|
5. `lock` implies `check`
|
||
|
3. Second deploy job fails with an error, _does not_ deploy
|
||
|
3. First deploy succeeds
|
||
|
1. Deploy job calls `deploy-lock unlock apps/staging/a/chat-app`
|
||
|
4. Second deploy job can be retried
|
||
|
1. No lock, runs normally
|
||
|
|
||
|
### Command-line Interface
|
||
|
|
||
|
```shell
|
||
|
> deploy-lock lock --path apps/staging --type automation --duration 60m
|
||
|
> deploy-lock lock --path apps/staging/a/auth-app --type deploy --duration 5m
|
||
|
> deploy-lock lock --path apps/staging --until 2022-12-31T12:00 # local TZ, unless Z specified
|
||
|
|
||
|
> deploy-lock unlock --path apps/staging --type automation # unlock type must match lock type
|
||
|
|
||
|
> deploy-lock check --path apps/staging/a/auth-app # is equivalent to
|
||
|
> deploy-lock check --path apps/staging --path apps/staging/a --path apps/staging/a/auth-app
|
||
|
> deploy-lock check --path apps/staging/a/auth-app --recursive=false # only checks the leaf node
|
||
|
|
||
|
> deploy-lock prune --path apps/staging # prune expired locks within the path
|
||
|
```
|
||
|
|
||
|
#### User Options
|
||
|
|
||
|
- `--type`
|
||
|
- string, enum
|
||
|
- type of lock
|
||
|
- one of `automation`, `deploy`, or `incident`
|
||
|
- `--path`
|
||
|
- array, strings
|
||
|
- record paths
|
||
|
- always lowercase (force in code)
|
||
|
- `/^[-a-z\/]+$/`
|
||
|
- `--author`
|
||
|
- string
|
||
|
- defaults to `$GITLAB_USER_EMAIL` if `$GITLAB_CI` is set
|
||
|
- defaults to `$USER` otherwise
|
||
|
- `--duration`
|
||
|
- number
|
||
|
- duration of lock, relative to now
|
||
|
- mutually exclusive with `--until`
|
||
|
- `--until`
|
||
|
- string, timestamp
|
||
|
- duration of lock, absolute
|
||
|
- mutually exclusive with `--duration`
|
||
|
- `--recursive`
|
||
|
- boolean
|
||
|
- recursively check locks
|
||
|
- defaults to true for `check`
|
||
|
- defaults to false for `lock`, `unlock`
|
||
|
- `--env-cluster`
|
||
|
- string, enum
|
||
|
- defaults to `$CLUSTER_NAME` if set
|
||
|
- defaults to `--path.split.0` otherwise
|
||
|
- `--env-account`
|
||
|
- string, enum
|
||
|
- defaults to `$DEPLOY_ENV` if set
|
||
|
- defaults to `--path.split.1` otherwise
|
||
|
- `--env-target`
|
||
|
- optional string
|
||
|
- `/^[a-z]$/`
|
||
|
- defaults to `$DEPLOY_TARGET` if set
|
||
|
- defaults to `--path.split.2` otherwise
|
||
|
- `--ci-project`
|
||
|
- optional string
|
||
|
- project path
|
||
|
- defaults to `$CI_PROJECT_PATH` if set
|
||
|
- defaults to `--path.split.3` otherwise
|
||
|
- `--ci-ref`
|
||
|
- optional string
|
||
|
- branch or tag
|
||
|
- defaults to `$CI_COMMIT_REF_SLUG` if set
|
||
|
- defaults to `--path.split.4` otherwise
|
||
|
- `--ci-commit`
|
||
|
- optional string
|
||
|
- SHA of ref
|
||
|
- defaults to `$CI_COMMIT_SHA` if set
|
||
|
- `--ci-pipeline`
|
||
|
- optional string
|
||
|
- pipeline ID
|
||
|
- defaults to `$CI_PIPELINE_ID` if set
|
||
|
- `--ci-job`
|
||
|
- optional string
|
||
|
- job ID
|
||
|
- defaults to `$CI_JOB_ID` if set
|
||
|
|
||
|
TODO: should there be an `update` or `replace` command?
|
||
|
|
||
|
TODO: should `--recursive` be available for `lock` or only `unlock`? A recursive lock would write multiple records
|
||
|
|
||
|
#### Backend Options
|
||
|
|
||
|
- `--storage`
|
||
|
- string
|
||
|
- one of `dynamodb`, `memory`
|
||
|
- `--table`
|
||
|
- string
|
||
|
- DynamoDB table name
|
||
|
|
||
|
### REST API
|
||
|
|
||
|
#### Endpoints
|
||
|
|
||
|
- `/locks GET`
|
||
|
- `/locks POST`
|
||
|
- `/locks/:path GET`?
|