1
0
Fork 0
deploy-lock/README.md

434 lines
16 KiB
Markdown
Raw Normal View History

# Deploy Lock
This is a tool to lock a cluster or service, in order to prevent people from deploying changes during test automation or
2023-01-01 17:17:58 +00:00
restarting pods during an infrastructure incident.
## Contents
- [Deploy Lock](#deploy-lock)
- [Contents](#contents)
- [Abstract](#abstract)
- [Example Usage](#example-usage)
- [Prevent a deploy during an automation run](#prevent-a-deploy-during-an-automation-run)
- [Prevent a deploy during a production incident](#prevent-a-deploy-during-a-production-incident)
- [Prevent duplicate deploys of the same service from conflicting](#prevent-duplicate-deploys-of-the-same-service-from-conflicting)
2023-01-01 17:26:45 +00:00
- [Deploy Path](#deploy-path)
- [Lock Data](#lock-data)
- [Messaging](#messaging)
- [Friendly Types](#friendly-types)
2023-01-02 19:56:21 +00:00
- [Usage](#usage)
- [Command-line Interface](#command-line-interface)
- [Basic Options](#basic-options)
- [Lock Data Options](#lock-data-options)
- [Storage Backend Options](#storage-backend-options)
2023-01-03 02:40:15 +00:00
- [Admission Controller Options](#admission-controller-options)
- [REST API](#rest-api)
- [Endpoints](#endpoints)
2023-01-02 19:56:21 +00:00
- [Development](#development)
- [Features](#features)
- [Building](#building)
2023-01-01 17:11:41 +00:00
- [Testing](#testing)
2023-01-02 19:56:21 +00:00
- [TODOs](#todos)
- [Questions](#questions)
## Abstract
2023-01-01 17:26:45 +00:00
### Example Usage
#### Prevent a deploy during an automation run
This would be used to prevent an application deploy during a test automation run, to make sure the application does not
restart or change versions and invalidate the test results.
1. QA starts an automation run
1. Automation calls `deploy-lock lock apps/acceptance --type automation --duration 90m`
2. Someone merges code into `develop` of `saas-app`
1. The `saas-app` pipeline runs a deploy job
2. The deploy job calls `deploy-lock check apps/acceptance/a/saas-app/develop`, which recursively checks:
1. `apps`
2. `apps/acceptance`
1. locked by automation, exit with an error
3. `apps/acceptance/a`
4. `apps/acceptance/a/saas-app`
5. `apps/acceptance/a/saas-app/develop`
3. Deploy job exits with an error, _does not_ deploy
3. Automation pipeline ends
1. Final job calls `deploy-lock unlock apps/acceptance --type automation`
1. Specifying the `--type` during `unlock` prevents automation/deploy jobs from accidentally removing an incident
2. If the final automation job does not run, the lock will still expire after 90 minutes (`--duration`)
4. Retry `saas-app` deploy job
1. No lock, runs normally
#### Prevent a deploy during a production incident
This would be used to prevent an application deploy during an infrastructure outage, to make sure existing pods
continue running.
1. DevOps receives an alert and declares an incident for the `apps/production/a` cluster
2. The first responder runs `deploy-lock lock apps/production --type incident --duration 6h`
1. This locks _both_ production clusters while we shift traffic to the working one
3. Someone merges code into `main` of `auth-app`
1. The `auth-app` pipeline runs a deploy job
2. The deploy job calls `deploy-lock check apps/production/a/auth-app`, which recursively checks:
1. `apps`
2. `apps/production`
1. locked by incident, exit with an error
3. `apps/production/a`
4. `apps/production/a/auth-app`
3. Deploy job exits with an error, _does not_ deploy
4. Incident is resolved
1. First responder runs `deploy-lock unlock apps/production --type incident`
5. Retry `auth-app` deploy job
1. No lock, runs normally
#### Prevent duplicate deploys of the same service from conflicting
This would be used to prevent multiple simultaneous deploys of the same project from conflicting with one another, in
a service without ephemeral environments/branch switching.
1. Someone starts a pipeline on `feature/foo` of `chat-app`
1. The `chat-app` pipeline runs a deploy job
2. The deploy job calls `deploy-lock lock apps/staging/a/chat-app`
2. Someone else starts a pipeline on `feature/bar` of `chat-app`
1. The `chat-app` pipeline runs another deploy job
1. The first one has not finished and is still mid-rollout
2. The second deploy job calls `deploy-lock lock apps/staging/a/chat-app`, which recursively checks:
1. `apps`
2. `apps/staging`
3. `apps/staging/a`
4. `apps/staging/a/chat-app`
1. locked by deploy, exit with an error
5. `lock` implies `check`
3. Second deploy job fails with an error, _does not_ deploy
3. First deploy succeeds
1. Deploy job calls `deploy-lock unlock apps/staging/a/chat-app`
4. Second deploy job can be retried
1. No lock, runs normally
### Deploy Path
The path to a service, starting with the cluster and environment: `apps/staging/a/auth-app`.
2023-01-01 17:17:58 +00:00
Path components may include:
- cluster
- env (`account`)
- target
- service (namespace)
- branch (`ref`)
2023-01-01 17:17:58 +00:00
When _locking_ a path, only the leaf path is locked, not parents.
When _checking_ a path, each segment is checked recursively, so a lock at `apps/staging` will prevent all services
2023-01-01 17:17:58 +00:00
from being deployed into both the `apps/staging/a` and `apps/staging/b` clusters.
- cluster comes first because that is how we structure the git repositories (repo = cluster, branch = env)
- to lock multiple clusters in the same environment, run the command repeatedly with the same lock data
- to lock a specific branch, put it in the path: `apps/staging/a/auth-app/main`
2023-01-01 17:17:58 +00:00
Ultimately, the deploy path's layout should follow the hierarchy of resources that you want to lock. One potential
order, for a multi-cloud Kubernetes architecture, is:
- cloud
- account
2023-01-01 17:17:58 +00:00
- region
- network
- cluster
- namespace
2023-01-01 17:17:58 +00:00
- resource name
2023-01-01 17:17:58 +00:00
Such as `aws/staging/us-east-1/apps/a/auth-app/api` or `gcp/production/us-east4-a/tools/gitlab/runner/ci`.
Including the region in the path can be limiting, but also allows locking an entire provider-region in case of serious
upstream incidents.
### Lock Data
Each lock must contain the following fields:
```typescript
interface Lock {
2023-01-01 17:26:45 +00:00
type: 'automation' | 'deploy' | 'freeze' | 'incident' | 'maintenance';
2023-01-01 17:57:21 +00:00
path: string;
author: string;
links: Map<string, string>;
2023-01-02 20:08:46 +00:00
// often duplicates of path, but useful for cross-project locks
source: string;
// Timestamps, calculated from --duration and --until
created_at: number;
updated_at: number;
expires_at: number;
// CI fields, optional
ci?: {
project: string;
ref: string;
commit: string;
pipeline: string;
job: string;
}
}
```
If `$CI` is not set, the `ci` sub-struct will not be present.
### Messaging
2023-01-01 17:26:45 +00:00
- create a new lock: `locked ${path} for ${type:friendly} until ${expires_at:datetime}`
- > Locked `apps/acceptance/a` for a deploy until Sat 31 Dec, 12:00
- > Locked `gitlab/production` for an incident until Sat 31 Dec, 12:00
2023-01-02 20:08:46 +00:00
- error, existing lock: `error: ${path} is locked until ${expires_at:datetime} by ${type:friendly} in ${source}`
- > Error: `apps/acceptance` is locked until Sat 31 Dec, 12:00 by an automation run in `testing/staging`.
2023-01-01 17:17:58 +00:00
#### Friendly Types
Friendly strings for `type`:
- `automation`: `An automation run`
- `deploy`: `A deploy`
- `freeze`: `A release freeze`
- `incident`: `An incident`
- `maintenance`: `A maintenance window`
2023-01-02 19:56:21 +00:00
## Usage
### Command-line Interface
```shell
2023-01-02 19:41:33 +00:00
> deploy-lock check apps/staging/a/auth-app # is equivalent to
> deploy-lock check apps && deploy-lock check apps/staging && deploy-lock check apps/staging/a && deploy-lock check apps/staging/a/auth-app
> deploy-lock check apps/staging/a/auth-app --recursive=false # only checks the leaf node
2023-01-02 19:41:33 +00:00
> deploy-lock list apps/staging # list all locks within the apps/staging path
2023-01-02 19:41:33 +00:00
> deploy-lock lock apps/staging --type automation --duration 60m
> deploy-lock lock apps/staging/a/auth-app --type deploy --duration 5m
> deploy-lock lock apps/staging --until 2022-12-31T12:00 # local TZ, unless Z specified
2023-01-01 17:38:42 +00:00
2023-01-02 19:41:33 +00:00
> deploy-lock prune # prune all expired locks
> deploy-lock prune apps/staging # prune expired locks within the path
> deploy-lock prune apps/staging --now future-date # prune locks that will expire by --now
2023-01-01 17:38:42 +00:00
2023-01-02 19:41:33 +00:00
> deploy-lock unlock apps/staging --type automation # unlock type must match lock type
```
#### Basic Options
2023-01-01 17:26:45 +00:00
- command
- one of `check`, `list`, `lock`, `prune`, `unlock`
2023-01-02 19:41:33 +00:00
- `<path>`
- positional, required
- string
- lock path
- always lowercase (forced in code)
- `/^[-a-z\/]+$/`
2023-01-01 17:11:41 +00:00
- `--now`
- number, optional
- defaults to current epoch time
- `--recursive`
- boolean
- recursively check locks
- defaults to true for `check`
- defaults to false for `lock`, `unlock`
- `--type`
- string, enum
- type of lock
2023-01-01 17:26:45 +00:00
- one of `automation`, `deploy`, `freeze`, `incident`, or `maintenance`
2023-01-01 17:11:41 +00:00
#### Lock Data Options
- `--author`
- string
- defaults to `$GITLAB_USER_EMAIL` if `$GITLAB_CI` is set
- defaults to `$USER` otherwise
- `--duration`
- string
- duration of lock, relative to now
2023-01-01 18:28:17 +00:00
- may be given in epoch seconds (`\d+`), as an ISO-8601 date, or a human interval (`30m`)
2023-01-01 17:11:41 +00:00
- mutually exclusive with `--until`
- `--link`
- array, strings
2023-01-02 20:08:46 +00:00
- `--source`
- string
- each component:
- first
- defaults to `$CLUSTER_NAME` if set
- defaults to `path.split.0` otherwise
- second
- defaults to `$DEPLOY_ENV` if set
- defaults to `path.split.1` otherwise
- third
- defaults to `$DEPLOY_TARGET` if set
- defaults to `path.split.2` otherwise
- fourth
- defaults to `--ci-project` if set
- defaults to `$CI_PROJECT_PATH` if set
- defaults to `path.split.3` otherwise
- fifth
- defaults to `--ci-ref` if set
- defaults to `$CI_COMMIT_REF_SLUG` if set
- defaults to `path.split.4` otherwise
- `--until`
- string, timestamp
- duration of lock, absolute
2023-01-01 18:28:17 +00:00
- may be given in epoch seconds (`\d+`) or as an ISO-8601 date (intervals are not allowed)
- mutually exclusive with `--duration`
- `--ci-project`
- optional string
- project path
- defaults to `$CI_PROJECT_PATH` if set
2023-01-02 19:41:33 +00:00
- defaults to `path.split.3` otherwise
- `--ci-ref`
- optional string
- branch or tag
- defaults to `$CI_COMMIT_REF_SLUG` if set
2023-01-02 19:41:33 +00:00
- defaults to `path.split.4` otherwise
- `--ci-commit`
- optional string
- SHA of ref
- defaults to `$CI_COMMIT_SHA` if set
- `--ci-pipeline`
- optional string
- pipeline ID
- defaults to `$CI_PIPELINE_ID` if set
- `--ci-job`
- optional string
- job ID
- defaults to `$CI_JOB_ID` if set
#### Storage Backend Options
- `--storage`
- string
- one of `dynamodb`, `memory`
- `--region`
- string, optional
- DynamoDB region name
- `--table`
- string
- DynamoDB table name
- `--endpoint`
- string, optional
- DynamoDB endpoint
- set to `http://localhost:8000` for testing with DynamoDB local
- `--fake`
- string, optional
- a fake lock that should be added to the in-memory data store
2023-01-01 18:28:17 +00:00
- the in-memory data store always starts empty, this is the only way to have an existing lock
2023-01-03 02:40:15 +00:00
#### Admission Controller Options
- `--admission-base`
- string
- base path for admission controller requests
- usually the path to the cluster within the deploy path, like `aws/staging/us-east-1/apps/a`
- `--admission-path`
- array, strings
- path keys to use when checking admission controller requests
- must be fields within the `AdmissionReview` kind
- usually something like `[namespace, name]` or `[namespace, requestResource.group, requestResource.resource, name]`
### REST API
#### Endpoints
- `/admission POST`
- Kubernetes admission controller webhook
- `/locks GET`
- equivalent to `deploy-lock list`
- `/locks POST`
- equivalent to `deploy-lock lock`
- path taken from request body
2023-01-01 17:38:42 +00:00
- `/locks DELETE`
- equivalent to `deploy-lock prune`
- `/locks/:path GET`
- equivalent to `deploy-lock check`
2023-01-01 17:38:42 +00:00
- `/locks/:path PUT`
- equivalent to `deploy-lock lock`
- path taken from URL path
2023-01-01 18:28:17 +00:00
- `/locks/:path DELETE`
- equivalent to `deploy-lock unlock`
- `/ok`
- health check
2023-01-02 19:56:21 +00:00
## Development
### Features
2023-01-02 20:08:46 +00:00
- in-memory data store, mostly for testing
- DynamoDB data store
- lock paths and recursive checking
- infer lock data from CI variables
2023-01-02 19:56:21 +00:00
### Building
1. Clone with `git clone git@github.com:ssube/deploy-lock.git`
2. Switch into the project directory with `cd deploy-lock`
3. Run a full lint, build, and test with `make ci`
4. Run the program's help with `make run-help` or `node out/src/index.js --help`
### Testing
You can test locally without a real DDB table using https://hub.docker.com/r/amazon/dynamodb-local.
2023-01-02 19:56:21 +00:00
1. Launch DynamoDB Local with `podman run --rm -p 8000:8000 docker.io/amazon/dynamodb-local`
2. Create a profile with `aws configure --profile localddb`
2023-01-03 05:33:10 +00:00
1. placeholder tokens
2023-01-02 19:56:21 +00:00
2. us-east-1 region
3. json output
3. Create a `locks` table with `aws dynamodb --endpoint-url http://localhost:8000 --profile localddb create-table --attribute-definitions 'AttributeName=path,AttributeType=S' --table-name locks --key-schema 'AttributeName=path,KeyType=HASH' --billing-mode PAY_PER_REQUEST`
4. Run commands using `AWS_PROFILE=localddb deploy-lock --storage dynamo --table locks --endpoint http://localhost:8000 ...`
### TODOs
2023-01-03 05:33:10 +00:00
1. Infer lock source from arguments/environment, like `CI_` variables
2023-01-02 20:08:46 +00:00
2. SQL data store, with history (don't need to remove old records)
3. S3 data store
2023-01-03 05:33:10 +00:00
4. Kubernetes admission controller with configurable paths
Other potential data stores could include: flat file, kubernetes configmap, etcd itself, consul, redis.
2023-01-02 19:56:21 +00:00
### Questions
1. In the [deploy path](#deploy-path), should account come before region or region before account?
1. `aws/us-east-1/staging` vs `aws/staging/us-east-1`
2023-01-02 20:08:46 +00:00
2. This is purely a recommendation in the docs, `lock.path` and `lock.source` will both be slash-delimited or array
paths.
2. Should there be an `update` or `replace` command?
1. Probably not, at least not without lock history or multi-party locks.
2. When the data store can keep old locks, `replace` could expire an existing lock and create a new one
3. With multi-party locks, `update` could update the `expires_at` and add a new author
2023-01-01 17:38:42 +00:00
3. Should `--recursive` be available for `lock` and `unlock`, or only `check`?
1. TBD
2. A recursive `lock` would write multiple records
3. A recursive `unlock` could delete multiple records
4. Should locks have multiple authors?
1. TBD
2. It doesn't make sense to have more than one active lock for the same path
1. Or does it?
2. Different levels can use `--allow` without creating multiple locks
3. But having multiple authors would allow for multi-party locks
1. for CI: `[gitlab, $GITLAB_USER_NAME]`
2023-01-01 17:38:42 +00:00
2. for an incident: `[first-responder, incident-commander]`
4. Each author has to `unlock` before the lock is removed/released
2023-01-01 18:49:22 +00:00
5. Should `LockData.env` be a string/array, like `LockData.path`?
2023-01-02 20:08:46 +00:00
1. Done
2. Very probably yes, because otherwise it will need `env.cloud`, `env.network`, etc, and those
2023-01-01 18:49:22 +00:00
are not always predictable/present.
6. Should there be an `--allow`/`LockData.allow` field?
1. Probably yes
2. When running `check --type`, if `LockData.allow` includes `--type`, it will be allowed
2023-01-01 18:49:22 +00:00
1. `freeze` should allow `automation`, but not `deploy`
2. `incident` could allow `deploy`, but not `automation`
7. Wildcards in paths?
1. Probably no, it will become confusing pretty quickly, and KV stores do not support them consistently (or at all).
2023-01-03 01:24:51 +00:00
8. Authz for API mutations?
1. If there is a REST API, it might need authn/authz.
2. Keeping the API private _could_ work.
3. Authorization should be scoped by path.
9. How should the `AdmissionReview` fields be mapped to path?
1. This could vary by user and may need to be configurable.
2023-01-03 05:33:10 +00:00
2. Probably using an argument, `--admission-path`
3. Will eventually need to use jsonpath for access to `userInfo.groups` list or maps